<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Texas Physicians Resource Council</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texasphysicians.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texasphysicians.org</link>
	<description>Strengthening our families, cultures, and communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Ultrasound Law a Victory for Women, Babies, Pro-Lifers</title>
		<link>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/texas-ultrasound-law-a-victory-for-women-babies-pro-lifers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/texas-ultrasound-law-a-victory-for-women-babies-pro-lifers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LindaFlower_MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Be Informed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonogram bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultrasound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasphysicians.org/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["On Friday February 10, the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans unanimously denied a request by opponents of the Texas Sonogram Law to reconsider the decision of a three-judge panel on that court several weeks ago to completely uphold the law’s constitutionality."
Comment: Now, finally the law will go into effect and women will have a chance to know the truth.  Pray for truth!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>On Friday February 10, the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans unanimously denied a request by opponents of the Texas Sonogram Law to reconsider the decision of a three-judge panel on that court several weeks ago to completely uphold the law’s constitutionality.</p></blockquote>
<div></div>
<p><a title="Texas Ultrasound" href="http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/13/texas-ultrasound-law-a-victory-for-women-babies-pro-lifers/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+lifenews%2Fnewsfeed+%28LifeNews.com%29" target="_blank">Read the Article</a></p>
<p>By Joe Pojman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/texas-ultrasound-law-a-victory-for-women-babies-pro-lifers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sign the Stop the Abortion Mandate Petition</title>
		<link>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/stop-the-abortion-mandate-petition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/stop-the-abortion-mandate-petition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LindaFlower_MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sign This]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Take Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasphysicians.org/?p=660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please follow this link and sign the petition. Send the letter to the White House too.  This effort is by Steven Ertelt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Join more than 4,200 people who are saying to Obama: Stop This Pro-Abortion Mandate<a style="word-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" href="http://t.co/343bBXMI"><span style="word-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">bit.ly/A2OuGL</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/stop-the-abortion-mandate-petition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex Selection Abortions Shock Us, but Abortion of the Disabled Still Justified By Nancy Flanders, Published February 9th, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/sex-selection-abortions-shock-us-but-abortion-of-the-disabled-still-justified-by-nancy-flanders-published-february-9th-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/sex-selection-abortions-shock-us-but-abortion-of-the-disabled-still-justified-by-nancy-flanders-published-february-9th-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LindaFlower_MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Be Informed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex selection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasphysicians.org/?p=654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent, now famous editorial in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, interim editor-in-chief Rajendra Kale called abortion of female babies “discrimination against women in its most extreme form.” He called for the withholding of information regarding the sex of any unborn baby until 30 weeks gestation in order to stop the female feticide that he reports to be occurring mainly in certain ethnic groups.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent, now famous editorial in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, interim editor-in-chief Rajendra Kale called abortion of female babies “discrimination against women in its most extreme form.” He called for the withholding of information regarding the sex of any unborn baby until 30 weeks gestation&#8230;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a title="Sex Selection Abortions Shock Us" href="http://liveaction.org/blog/sex-selection-abortions-shock-us-but-abortion-of-the-disabled-still-justified/" target="_blank">Sex Selection Abortions Shock Us</a></p>
<p>by Nancy Flanders at liveaction.org</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/sex-selection-abortions-shock-us-but-abortion-of-the-disabled-still-justified-by-nancy-flanders-published-february-9th-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margret Sanger: Racist founder of Planned Parenthood</title>
		<link>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/margret-sanger-racist-founder-of-planned-parenthood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/margret-sanger-racist-founder-of-planned-parenthood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LindaFlower_MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Be Informed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasphysicians.org/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Check out this video on YouTube: &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Check out this video on YouTube:</p>
<p><iframe width="399" height="203" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/kEja-1emRic" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/margret-sanger-racist-founder-of-planned-parenthood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Declares War on Pro-Lifers in Conscience Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/obama-declares-war-on-pro-lifers-in-conscience-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/obama-declares-war-on-pro-lifers-in-conscience-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LindaFlower_MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Be Informed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right of conscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasphysicians.org/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, the Obama Administration issued a statement re-iterating the “contraceptive mandate” requiring all insurance providers cover the full range of FDA-approved drugs and devices would remain intact. This mandate, issued in August, includes drugs that work after conception to destroy life rather than prevent it. The statement included a postponement of one year for religious groups that do not already carry contraceptives and additionally would not be exempted under last year’s narrow definition of “religious employer.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Obama Declares War on Pro-Lifers in Conscience Battle" href="http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/06/obama-declares-war-on-pro-lifers-in-conscience-battle/?  utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+lifenews%2Fnewsfeed+%28LifeNews.com%29" target="_blank">Obama Declares War on Pro-Lifers</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/obama-declares-war-on-pro-lifers-in-conscience-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austin City Council Attacks Pregnancy Centers</title>
		<link>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/austin-city-council-attacks-pregnancy-centers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/austin-city-council-attacks-pregnancy-centers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LindaFlower_MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Be Informed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasphysicians.org/?p=616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AUSTIN, Texas, April 8 &#8211; Today, the Austin [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AUSTIN, Texas, April 8</strong> &#8211; Today, the Austin City Council heard testimony and unanimously voted (7-0) to pass an ordinance specifically designed to attack pregnancy resource centers (PRCs). This ordinance is the first-of-its-kind in Texas, and requires only PRCs to post signs at their entrance that they do not provide or refer for abortions or birth control. There is no corresponding requirement that abortion facilities post signs about the services they do not provide.</p>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This ordinance was being pushed by the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL). Such a law has already been passed in Baltimore, Maryland, but it is being challenged in court. Liberty Institute testified at today&#8217;s City Council meeting, and will work to defeat these attacks on charitable centers that are so valuable to women.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&#8220;This pro-abortion, political effort by the City Council and NARAL is an outrageous example of out of control government,&#8221; said Jonathan Saenz, director of legislative affairs at Liberty Institute. &#8220;Why is the City of Austin so hostile to the needs of pregnant women served by charitable pregnancy centers?&#8221;</p>
</div>
<p><a title="Austin City Council Attacks Pregnancy Centers" href="http://libertyinstitute.org/issues.php?category=7&amp;article=64" target="_blank"> Source: Liberty Institute</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/02/austin-city-council-attacks-pregnancy-centers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What would the Pence Amendment Mean to Planned Parenthood?</title>
		<link>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/what-would-the-pence-amendment-mean-to-planned-parenthood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/what-would-the-pence-amendment-mean-to-planned-parenthood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LindaFlower_MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Be Informed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasphysicians.org/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Pence amendment, sponsored by Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., bans Planned Parenthood from receiving federal funds. The Republican-dominated House of Representatives approved the amendment 240-185 after a debate that featured Democratic Rep. Jackie Speier recounting the story of receiving an abortion due to a complication with a pregnancy.

The vote is something of a coup for Pence. As Politico said earlier this week, "Abortion-rights advocates and abortion-rights opponents don't see eye to eye on much, but they do agree on this: Nobody hates Planned Parenthood quite as much as Mike Pence."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="What is the pence amendment and what does it mean for planned parenthood?" href="http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/18/what-is-the-pence-amendment-and-what-does-it-mean-for-planned-p/" target="_blank">http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/18/what-is-the-pence-amendment-and-what-does-it-mean-for-planned-p/</a></p>
<p>by Torie Bosch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/what-would-the-pence-amendment-mean-to-planned-parenthood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bishops Refuse to comply with Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/bishops-refuse-to-comply-with-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/bishops-refuse-to-comply-with-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LindaFlower_MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Be Informed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasphysicians.org/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least three Catholic bishops have said they will not comply with the mandate the Obama administration put in place recently in Obamacare that will force religious employers to pay for birth control, contraception and drugs that may cause abortions in their health care plans.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/30/bishops-refuse-to-comply-with-obamacare-birth-control-mandate/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/bishops-refuse-to-comply-with-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rehash of Abortion Safety Claim ignores all previous research</title>
		<link>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/rehash-of-abortion-safety-claim-ignores-all-previous-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/rehash-of-abortion-safety-claim-ignores-all-previous-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LindaFlower_MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Be Informed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Take Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion-related deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasphysicians.org/?p=606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Springfield, IL (January 25, 2012) — Hundreds of news articles appeared this week claiming, once again, that the best medical evidence shows that abortion is safer than childbirth.  The rash of articles were all tied to a blatant piece of propaganda published in Obstetrics and Gynecology by Dr. David Grimes, an abortion provider and chief propagandist for “medical proof” of abortion’s safety.

The new study repeats the same discredited practice of simply comparing nationally reported maternal mortality rates with Center for Disease Control (CDC) reported deaths associated with abortion.  Sounds reasonable, until you learn that there is no accurate or formal mechanism for reporting abortion-related deaths. Indeed, the rules regarding completion of death certificates specifically exclude identifying abortion as a cause of death."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://<a title="Re-hash of Abortion Safety Ignores Previous Data" href="http://afterabortion.org/2012/re-hash-of-abortion-safety-claim-ignores-all-inconvenient-evidence-to-the-contrary/" target="_blank">afterabortion.org/2012/re-hash-of-abortion-safety-claim-ignores-all-inconvenient-evidence-to-the-contrary/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/rehash-of-abortion-safety-claim-ignores-all-previous-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Responding to Islam: Lessons from Barth, Bonhoffer and George</title>
		<link>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/responding-to-islam-lessons-from-barth-bonhoffer-and-george/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/responding-to-islam-lessons-from-barth-bonhoffer-and-george/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LindaFlower_MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Be Informed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Take Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonhoffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasphysicians.org/?p=602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Karl Barth. Bishop George Bell. Dismissed, derided, and in one case even martyred, each of these Christian leaders took a stand against the threat of Nazism.

Today, a similar threat faces Christians in the US, across Europe, and much more dramatically throughout the Muslim world. Radical Islam's jihadist ideology does not peacefully coexist with Christianity. And Christian leaders-both political and pastoral-should know more about the threats they face.

Join us as author, pastor, and human rights advocate Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo explains the threat of radical Islam and offers a clear and Christian response. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responding to Islam</p>
<p><em><strong>Featuring Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo, International Director, The Barnabas Fund</strong></em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>http://<a title="Responding to Islam: Lessons from Barth, Bonhoffer and George" href="http://http://www.frc.org/events/responding-to-islam-lessons-from-dietrich-bonhoeffer-karl-barth-and-bishop-george-bell">www.frc.org/events/responding-to-islam-lessons-from-dietrich-bonhoeffer-karl-barth-and-bishop-george-bell</a></p>
<p>Please follow this link to learn more about how we can effectively understand and respond to the spread of Islam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texasphysicians.org/2012/01/responding-to-islam-lessons-from-barth-bonhoffer-and-george/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

